International Journal of Research and Reports in Dentistry

Background: Informed consent is a foundational ethical and legal obligation in dental practice. While its theoretical importance is well acknowledged, its consistent implementation remains variable across clinical settings.

Objective: This study explores the perceptions, practices, and challenges surrounding informed consent among dental practitioners in Hyderabad, Telangana, with the aim of identifying gaps and proposing improvements to enhance ethical standards and patient-centered care.

Methods: A qualitative, cross-sectional approach was employed to assess how dentists interpret and apply informed consent in routine clinical contexts. Data were gathered on attitudes, procedural habits, and barriers to implementation.

Results: The majority of respondents (56%) viewed informed consent primarily as a tool for medico-legal protection, reflecting a defensive practice culture. While 44% recognized its role in building trust and enhancing communication, practical adherence was inconsistent. Consent was often limited to surgical or invasive procedures, with routine care frequently proceeding without formal documentation. Verbal consent (30%) and implied consent through outpatient cards were also common. Barriers included lack of standardized protocols (40%), language and cultural challenges (26%), time constraints (10%), and legal insecurity (10%). These findings aligned with previous literature emphasizing the disconnect between ethical ideals and clinical realities.

Conclusion: Despite awareness of its ethical significance, the application of informed consent in dentistry is often reduced to a legal safeguard. There is a pressing need for standardized guidelines, practitioner training, and institutional support to ensure consent processes are both ethically sound and practically feasible. Future research should consider the influence of clinical setups and patient demographics on consent practices.