Digital Periodontal Probing in Modern Dentistry: Perceptions, Awareness and Clinical Adaptation among Dental Professionals

Angelin Beulah

Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Ajantha *

Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Dhathri Priya Bandi

Department of Periodontology, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Archana Balakrishnan

Department of Periodontology, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Uma Sudhakar

Department of Periodontology, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Background: Periodontal probing constitutes the pivotal diagnostic modality in periodontology; nonetheless, conventional manual probes are encumbered by operator-dependent variability, inconsistent probing dynamics, and diminished measurement reproducibility. The emergence of digital periodontal probes represents a technological paradigm shift, devised to attenuate such methodological limitations through calibrated probing force, automated digital documentation, and superior diagnostic standardisation.

Aim: To critically appraise the level of cognisance, perceptual orientation, and attitudinal disposition of dental professionals and students toward digital periodontal probing and its clinical assimilation.

Methods: A descriptive, questionnaire-based cross-sectional investigation was undertaken involving 100 participants encompassing dental undergraduates, practitioners, and academicians. Data acquisition was facilitated via a structured electronic Google Form, and statistical interpretation was executed through descriptive analytical parameters, including frequency and percentage distributions.

Results: Approximately 75% of respondents acknowledged familiarity with digital periodontal probes, while 68% adjudged the modality to possess superior diagnostic precision relative to conventional manual counterparts. The predominant deterrents delineated were elevated procurement cost (60%) and inadequate professional training (48%). A substantial proportion (72%) concurred that digital systems substantially augment diagnostic fidelity, documentation efficiency, and patient comfort.

Conclusion: The present inquiry elucidates a high degree of theoretical awareness juxtaposed with restricted experiential engagement concerning digital periodontal probing. The findings accentuate the exigency for structured pedagogical interventions, economic feasibility, and institutional endorsement to foster comprehensive clinical integration of digital periodontal diagnostic technologies. Pragmatic implementation of targeted training modules, cost-reduction strategies, and institutional support mechanisms is imperative to ensure sustainable and widespread clinical adoption of digital probing systems.

Keywords: Digital periodontal probe, periodontal diagnostics, automated charting, professional awareness, diagnostic reproducibility, clinical integration


How to Cite

Beulah, Angelin, Ajantha, Dhathri Priya Bandi, Archana Balakrishnan, and Uma Sudhakar. 2025. “Digital Periodontal Probing in Modern Dentistry: Perceptions, Awareness and Clinical Adaptation Among Dental Professionals”. International Journal of Research and Reports in Dentistry 8 (2):515-22. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijrrd/2025/v8i2262.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.